INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE WORKPLACE
What drives people at workplace, Descriptive study on Extrinsic & Intrinsic Motivation
The allure of extrinsic ewards as a primary driver of
workplace engagement has long held sway. However, this
analysis repositions intrinsic needs as the cornerstone of a
fulfilling and productive work environment. Through a
comparative lens, we unveil the intricate interplay between
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, exposing the limitations of a
purely reward-driven approach and proposing a model for
harmonious alignment.
KEYWORDS: Intrinsic Vs. Extrinsic Motivation, Workplace.
1. INTRODUCTION:
1.1 Background – About motivation, Types of motivation Intrinsic vs Extrinsic
Motivation, the driving force behind human behavior, has captivated the minds of philosophers,
psychologists, and researchers for centuries. Its enigmatic nature lies in its ability to propel individuals
towards diverse goals and actions, shaping their lives and influencing the world around them.
It can be broadly understood as the internal state that energizes individuals and directs them
towards specific goals or activities. This internal state is a complex interplay of psychological, biological,
and social factors, each contributing to the unique motivational tapestry of each individual.
One of the key avenues of research in motivation lies in its classification. Scholars have
identified various types of motivation, each with its distinct characteristics and driving forces. Intrinsic
motivation arises from inherent interest, enjoyment, or curiosity in the activity itself. It is associated
with autonomy, mastery, and purpose, driving individuals to engage in activities for the sheer
satisfaction of the process.
In contrast, extrinsic motivation is fueled by external rewards or punishments. Recognition,
grades, or financial incentives can all serve as external motivators, prompting individuals to engage in
activities for the desired outcome rather than the intrinsic experience.
Beyond this fundamental distinction, a plethora of other motivational types exist. Achievement
motivation reflects a desire for excellence and mastery, while power motivation denotes the need for
influence and control. Affiliation motivation emphasizes a desire for social connection and belonging,
while affiliation motivation drives individuals to seek out novel experiences and challenges.
Furthermore, cognitive motivation focuses on the intrinsic desire to learn and explore, while prosocial
motivation fuels altruistic behavior and the desire to help others.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
1
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
1.2 Problem/Question – Driver of work Extrinsic or Intrinsic motivation
In today's dynamic and highly competitive workplace, understanding the intricacies of
employee motivation is of paramount importance for organizations aiming to thrive and excel.
Employee motivation serves as the driving force behind productivity, job satisfaction, and ultimately, an
organization's success.This research endeavor embarks on a comprehensive exploration of the
multifaceted concept of motivation, focusing specifically on the contrasting dimensions of intrinsic and
extrinsic motivation.
The workplace presents a complex ecosystem where various factors influence employees' drive
to perform optimally. Intrinsic motivation, stemming from an individual's internal desires, values, and
passion for their work, often contrasts with extrinsic motivation, which arises from external rewards,
recognition, or tangible benefits. This study seeks to delve deep into this juxtaposition, unraveling the
nuanced dynamics between these two distinct motivational paradigms.
By conducting a meticulous comparative analysis, this research aspires to unveil the relative
significance and interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators within the workplace context.
Furthermore, it aims to elucidate how these motivational dimensions interact with one another, and the
extent to which they contribute to employee performance, job satisfaction, and overall engagement.
1.3 Literature Review–Factors of both motivation
Motivation is a complex phenomenon that drives human behavior. It can be broadly categorized
into two types: intrinsic motivation, which stems from internal factors and personal satisfaction, and
extrinsic motivation, which is driven by external rewards or punishments. This literature review aims
to examine the various factors and components that influence both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation,
shedding light on the intricate interplay between these motivational drivers.
Factors Influencing Intrinsic Motivation:
1. Autonomy: Autonomy, the extent to which individuals have control over their actions and choices,
emerges as a central factor influencing intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985). When people are
granted autonomy in their tasks, they are more likely to feel a sense of ownership and engage
intrinsically in those activities. Autonomy aligns with the basic psychological need for self
determination and fosters a sense of personal responsibility.
2. Competence: The perception of competence or mastery plays a pivotal role in driving intrinsic
motivation (White, 1959). When individuals believe they have the skills and abilities to succeed in a
task, they are more inclined to engage in it intrinsically. Competence is closely intertwined with self
efficacy, which reflects an individual's confidence in their capabilities.
3. Relatedness: Social connections and a sense of belongingness to a group or community contribute
to intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Deci and Ryan's Self-Determination Theory (SDT)
highlights relatedness as one of the three fundamental psychological needs. A supportive and
inclusive social environment can enhance intrinsic motivation by fulfilling the need for connection
and interpersonal relationships.
4. Interest and Enjoyment: Tasks that align with an individual's interests and provide enjoyment are
natural triggers for intrinsic motivation. Csikszentmihalyi's concept of "flow" (1990) characterizes
the immersive and enjoyable experience individuals have when engaged in activities that challenge
their skills and align with their interests.
5. Mastery and Challenge: Intrinsic motivation thrives in environments that strike a balance between
challenge and opportunities for skill development (Deci & Ryan, 1985). The pursuit of mastery and
personal growth serves as a potent intrinsic motivator. When individuals perceive a task as neither
too easy nor overwhelmingly difficult, they are more likely to experience intrinsic motivation.
Factors Influencing Extrinsic Motivation:
1. Rewards and Incentives: External rewards, such as monetary compensation, recognition, or prizes,
exert significant influence on extrinsic motivation. Expectancy Theory (Vroom, 1964) posits that
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
2
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
individuals are motivated when they anticipate that their efforts will lead to tangible or intangible
rewards. Rewards can range from financial bonuses in the workplace to stickers awarded to
children in educational settings.
2. Punishments and Sanctions: Conversely, the fear of negative consequences or punishments can
serve as extrinsic motivators. Reinforcement Theory (Skinner, 1938) underscores how the
avoidance of undesirable outcomes can stimulate behavior. Punishments, whether in the form of
fines for traffic violations or detention for students, often deter individuals from engaging in certain
behaviors.
3. Goal Setting: The process of setting specific, challenging goals is instrumental in enhancing extrinsic
motivation. Locke and Latham's Goal-Setting Theory (1990) argues that clear objectives, when
linked with extrinsic rewards, can elevate motivation. Goal setting provides individuals with a clear
target to work toward, often fueled by the promise of rewards upon achievement.
4. Social Comparisons: Social factors, including competition and social recognition, can evoke extrinsic
motivation. People frequently strive to outperform others or gain approval and admiration from
peers and superiors. In the workplace, performance rankings and awards ceremonies exemplify
how social comparisons can drive motivation.
5. External Expectations: Extrinsic motivation often emerges from societal or organizational
expectations. Individuals may engage in specific behaviors to meet external standards, conform to
societal norms, or fulfill obligations within formal systems. Compliance with laws, rules, and
regulations is a prime example of behavior driven by external expectations.
1.3.1 Empirical Findings – Motivation Type & Motivation Drivers
Delving deeper into the empirical landscape of intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation reveals
fascinating insights that can inform effective workplace practices. While intrinsic motivation
consistently outperforms extrinsic motivation in driving positive outcomes, the picture is more
nuanced than a simple dichotomy.
A Symphony of Benefits: The Enduring Power of Intrinsic Motivation:
Fueling Creativity and Innovation: Research by Khilji and Shah (2007) found that intrinsic
motivation fosters a "growth mindset," leading to higher levels of creativity and innovation in the
workplace. Similarly, Amabile (1996) identified intrinsic motivation as a key driver of "intrinsic
work motivation," characterized by a desire to learn and explore, leading to novel solutions and
creative breakthroughs.
Boosting Performance and Productivity: Studies by Cerasoli et al. (2014) and Gagné and Deci (2005)
demonstrated that intrinsic motivation enhances employee performance and productivity. This is
attributed to increased engagement, focus, and a willingness to exert discretionary effort.
Unlocking Engagement and Well-being: Research by Bakker and Demerouti (2008) linked intrinsic
motivation to higher levels of employee engagement, characterized by vigor, dedication, and
absorption in work. This positive engagement translates to reduced stress, increased job
satisfaction, and improved overall well-being.
Enhancing Learning and Development: Intrinsic motivation, according to Vallerand et
al. (1997), fuels a desire for knowledge and skill acquisition. This leads to increased engagement in
learning opportunities, improved skill development, and enhanced adaptability to changing work
demands.
Navigating the Nuances: Extrinsic Motivation's Conditional Impact:
The Double-Edged Sword of Rewards: While rewards can initially boost motivation, their
effectiveness wanes over time. Deci et al. (1985) found that tangible rewards can undermine
intrinsic
motivation, leading
to
a focus on extrinsic outcomes over personal
fulfillment. Additionally, research by Kohn (1993) highlights the potential for rewards to create
feelings of pressure and control, ultimately hindering creativity and innovation.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
3
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
Finding Alignment: Integrating Extrinsic with Intrinsic Motivation: Certain extrinsic
motivators, when aligned with intrinsic needs and values, can be beneficial. Ryan and Deci (2000)
identified "autonomous relatedness" as a key factor, where extrinsic rewards support
autonomy, competence, and relatedness, fostering intrinsic motivation.
Recognition as a Double-edged Sword: Research by Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) found that
recognition can be both a powerful motivator and a potential demotivator. Recognition focused on
intrinsic motivators, such as effort and mastery, leads to increased satisfaction and
performance. However, recognition focused solely on extrinsic outcomes can undermine intrinsic
motivation and create feelings of pressure.
Individual Differences and Contextual Influences:
The relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is further influenced by individual
differences and contextual factors. Personality traits, such as openness to experience and
conscientiousness, can moderate the impact of different types of motivation (Gagné& Deci, 2005).
Additionally, organizational factors, such as leadership style, work environment, and job characteristics,
play a crucial role in shaping employee motivation (Hackman & Oldham, 1976; La Guardia et al., 2000).
Harnessing the Symphony: Cultivating Intrinsic Motivation in the Workplace:
The compelling evidence supporting intrinsic motivation highlights the need for organizations
to create work environments that nurture it. This involves fostering:
a. Autonomy: Providing employees with autonomy and decision-making opportunities increases their
sense of control and ownership over their work, enhancing intrinsic motivation.
b. Competence: Offering opportunities for skill development and mastery experiences helps
employees feel capable and confident, further fueling their intrinsic motivation.
c.
Relatedness: Creating a culture of belonging, collaboration, and positive relationships fosters a
sense of connection and belonging, contributing to increased intrinsic motivation.
d. Meaningful Work: Aligning employee work with their values and purpose provides a sense of
meaning and significance, further enhancing intrinsic motivation.
1.4 Thesis Statement
The relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is influenced by individual
differences and contextual factors, necessitating a nuanced approach to creating motivational strategies
that cater to diverse employee needs.
2. Analysis and Synthesis of Existing Research:
2.1 Intrinsic Motivation and its Impact on Employee Outcomes
2.1.1. Performance and Productivity –
A vast body of research paints a compelling picture, revealing intrinsic motivation as a potent
driver of excellence. Studies by Deci, Amabile, and Locke (1999, 1996, 2002) illuminate the positive
correlation between intrinsic motivation and increased creativity, innovation, and overall productivity,
outshining the often fleeting glow of extrinsic rewards. This enhanced performance stems from a
deeper wellspring, fueled by autonomy, competence, and a sense of purpose (Gagné& Deci, 2005).
When employees feel empowered to make decisions, develop their skills, and connect their work to a
meaningful purpose, they naturally engage more fully, pouring their energies into tasks with a vigor
that extrinsic rewards alone cannot match (Bakker & Demerouti, 2008; Kahn, 1990). This intrinsic drive
fosters a virtuous cycle, leading to improved problem-solving, increased initiative, and a positive work
attitude (Vallerand et al., 1997).
However, the landscape of motivation is not without its complexities. Extrinsic rewards, while
capable of offering a temporary boost, can inadvertently undermine intrinsic motivation over time,
potentially leading to decreased interest and creativity (Deci et al., 1985). Kohn (1993) further cautions
against the pitfalls of extrinsic rewards, highlighting their potential to create a transactional and
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
4
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
pressure-laden work environment. The key, therefore, lies in understanding the nuanced interplay
between intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) emphasize the
importance of alignment, suggesting that extrinsic rewards can be beneficial when they resonate with
intrinsic needs and values. Recognition focused on effort, mastery, and growth can foster intrinsic
motivation, while rewards solely focused on extrinsic outcomes can have the opposite effect.
For organizations seeking to unlock the full potential of their workforce, prioritizing intrinsic
motivation becomes a strategic imperative. This involves cultivating work environments that nurture
autonomy, competence, and meaningful work. Leaders play a pivotal role in shaping this landscape,
providing support, fostering trust, and creating a culture that empowers employees to thrive (Deci &
Ryan, 2000). By understanding the power of intrinsic motivation and implementing strategies that tap
into it, organizations can empower their employees, ignite their creativity, and fuel a sustainable engine
of productivity and performance.
2.1.2. Engagement and Well-being
Studies by Deci and Ryan (2000), Bakker and Demerouti (2008), and Kahn (1990) illuminate
the positive correlation between intrinsic motivation and heightened engagement. This engagement is
not a mere flicker, but a vibrant fire, fueled by autonomy, competence, and a sense of connection. When
employees feel empowered to make decisions, master their skills, and contribute to a meaningful cause,
their work becomes more than a task; it becomes a passion, igniting a dedication that transcends
external rewards. This intrinsic drive fosters a virtuous cycle, leading to increased initiative, vigor, and
a positive work attitude.
However, the terrain of motivation is not without its shadows. Extrinsic rewards, while capable
of offering a temporary spark, can inadvertently cast a veil over intrinsic motivation over time,
potentially leading to decreased satisfaction and even burnout (Deci et al., 1985; Kohn, 1993). The key,
therefore, lies in understanding the delicate dance between these two forces. Eisenberger and Cameron
(1996) suggest that extrinsic rewards can be allies when they complement intrinsic needs and values.
Recognition focused on effort, mastery, and growth can fan the flames of intrinsic motivation, while
rewards solely focused on outcomes can extinguish them.
For leaders seeking to cultivate a thriving work environment, nurturing intrinsic motivation
becomes a guiding light. This involves fostering autonomy, providing opportunities for competence
development, and ensuring work is aligned with employees’ values (Gagné& Deci, 2005). Leaders play a
crucial role in shaping this landscape, creating a culture of trust, support, and growth that empowers
employees to find meaning in their work (Deci & Ryan, 2000).
By understanding the power of intrinsic motivation and implementing strategies that tap into it,
organizations can ignite a sustainable fire of engagement and well-being. This fire will not only
illuminate the path to increased productivity and performance, but also guide employees towards a
fulfilling and meaningful work experience.
2.1.3. Creativity and Innovation
In the realm of creativity and innovation, intrinsic motivation takes center stage, not as a
supporting player, but as the conductor of the orchestra. A vast body of research paints a compelling
picture, revealing this internal drive as the potent fuel propelling groundbreaking ideas and novel
solutions.
Studies by Amabile (1996), Amabile et al. (1996), and Deci et al. (1999) illuminate the positive
link between intrinsic motivation and heightened creativity. This isn't mere tinkering; it's a passionate
exploration fueled by curiosity, a thirst for challenge, and a desire to make a meaningful contribution.
When employees are intrinsically motivated, their minds dance with possibilities, their hands itch to
build and experiment, and their hearts beat with the rhythm of discovery.
The magic lies in the inherent freedom and autonomy intrinsic motivation fosters. As Gagné and
Deci (2005) point out, it allows individuals to explore, take risks, and connect with their work on a
deeper level, leading to more original and insightful solutions. This intrinsic drive fosters a virtuous
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
5
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
cycle of experimentation, iteration, and breakthrough, pushing the boundaries of the known and
illuminating new paths forward.
However, the landscape of innovation is not without its obstacles. Extrinsic rewards, while
capable of offering a temporary jolt, can inadvertently dim the spark of intrinsic motivation, potentially
leading to formulaic thinking and a focus on replicating past successes rather than venturing into the
unknown (Deci et al., 1985; Kohn, 1993). The key, therefore, lies in understanding the delicate interplay
between these forces. Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) suggest that extrinsic rewards can be allies
when they complement intrinsic needs and values. Recognition focused on effort, learning, and growth
can fan the flames of creativity, while rewards solely focused on outcomes can extinguish them.
Leaders seeking to cultivate a culture of innovation must prioritize fostering intrinsic
motivation. This involves creating a work environment that nurtures autonomy, provides opportunities
for exploration and risk-taking, and celebrates the journey of discovery as much as the destination
(Amabile, 1996). Leaders play a crucial role in shaping this landscape, creating a culture of trust,
psychological safety, and continuous learning that empowers employees to embrace the unknown and
chase their creative sparks.
By understanding the power of intrinsic motivation and implementing strategies that tap into it,
organizations can unlock a boundless wellspring of creativity and innovation. This potent force will not
only drive groundbreaking ideas and novel solutions, but also empower employees to find joy and
fulfillment in the process of creation.
2.2. Extrinsic Motivation and its Double-Edged Sword
2.2.1. Short-Term Benefits and Long-Term Drawbacks
Extrinsic motivation, the carrot and stick of the workplace, casts a long shadow, its impact on
employee behavior both alluring and complex. Research paints a nuanced picture, revealing its ability
to drive immediate performance gains while harboring the potential for long-term drawbacks.
Studies by Deci et al. (1985), Amabile et al. (1996), and Locke and Latham (2002) illustrate the
short-term benefits of extrinsic rewards. Bonuses, promotions, and other tangible incentives can act as
powerful motivators, leading to increased effort, goal attainment, and even higher productivity. This
initial boost can be valuable, especially for initiating new tasks or overcoming initial hurdles.
However, the allure of external motivators can come at a cost. Over-reliance on extrinsic
rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation, the internal drive fueled by curiosity, challenge, and a
sense of purpose (Deci & Ryan, 2000). As Kohn (1993) warns, extrinsic rewards can create feelings of
pressure, control, and a transactional approach to work, ultimately diminishing the joy and creativity
inherent in the task itself. This can lead to decreased interest, reduced innovation, and even burnout in
the long run.
The key, therefore, lies in understanding the delicate balance between extrinsic and intrinsic
motivators. Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) suggest that extrinsic rewards can be beneficial when
they are aligned with intrinsic needs and values. Recognition focused on effort, mastery, and growth can
complement intrinsic motivation, while rewards solely focused on outcomes can backfire. For example,
offering bonuses for exceeding sales goals can be effective, but tying them to specific sales tactics can
stifle creativity and experimentation.
Leaders seeking to harness the power of extrinsic motivation effectively must do so
strategically. This involves designing reward systems that are transparent, fair, and aligned with
organizational values and individual aspirations. Leaders play a crucial role in creating a culture where
extrinsic rewards are seen as a support system, not a control mechanism, and where intrinsic
motivation is cultivated through autonomy, competence, and meaningful work (Gagné& Deci, 2005).
By understanding the complex interplay between extrinsic and intrinsic motivators,
organizations can leverage the short-term benefits of extrinsic rewards while nurturing the long-term
value of intrinsic motivation. This balanced approach can empower employees, drive sustainable
performance, and create a work environment where both productivity and passion flourish.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
6
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
2.2.2. Aligning Extrinsic Rewards with Intrinsic Needs –
Extrinsic rewards, the shiny lure in the workplace pond, have long held the promise of
motivating employees. Yet, research reveals a complex dance between these external motivators and
the deeper wellspring of intrinsic needs. Aligning extrinsic rewards with these intrinsic needs, like
striking the golden chord in music, can unlock a symphony of performance and fulfillment.
Studies by Deci et al. (1985), Amabile (1996), and Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) illustrate
the potential pitfalls of misaligned extrinsic rewards. When rewards solely focus on outcomes, like sales
figures or performance metrics, they can undermine intrinsic motivation, the fuel for creativity,
exploration, and personal growth. This disconnect can lead to decreased engagement, reduced
satisfaction, and even burnout.
However, research by Gagné and Deci (2005) and Kohn (1993) paints a different picture when
extrinsic rewards resonate with intrinsic needs. When recognition acknowledges effort, mastery, and
learning, it can reinforce intrinsic motivation, creating a virtuous cycle of engagement and performance.
For example, praising a team for their collaborative problem-solving skills, rather than simply focusing
on the achieved outcome, fosters a sense of competence and belonging, aligning external validation with
internal desires.
By aligning extrinsic rewards with intrinsic needs, organizations can move beyond a
transactional approach to motivation. They can cultivate a work environment where external
motivators become partners in the journey of personal growth and fulfillment, leading to a symphony of
engaged, productive, and thriving employees.
2.2.3. The Potential for Demotivation and Crowding Out
While extrinsic rewards like bonuses, promotions, and praise have long been used to motivate
employees, research paints a nuanced picture, revealing their potential to demotivate and crowd out
intrinsic motivation, the internal drive fueled by curiosity, challenge, and personal growth.
Studies by Deci et al. (1985, 1999), Amabile (1996), and Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) shed
light on this phenomenon. When extrinsic rewards solely focus on outcomes, neglecting the process of
effort and mastery, they can undermine intrinsic motivation. This can lead to several negative
consequences:
a. Demotivation: Rewards can shift the focus from the joy and satisfaction of the work itself to the
external reward, creating a transactional relationship with the task. As the reward loses its novelty,
employees may lose interest and become less engaged, leading to decreased performance and
productivity.
b. Crowding Out: Extrinsic rewards can crowd out intrinsic motivation by implying that the task itself
is not inherently valuable. This can lead to a decrease in creativity, exploration, and risk-taking, as
employees prioritize behaviors that directly lead to the reward rather than pursuing their own
interests and goals.
c.
Reduced Autonomy: Over-reliance on extrinsic rewards can create a sense of control and pressure,
diminishing employee autonomy and feelings of self-determination. This can lead to decreased
engagement, increased stress, and a decline in well-being.
However, research by Gagné and Deci (2005) and Kohn (1993) suggests that extrinsic rewards
can still be beneficial under certain conditions. When aligned with intrinsic needs and values, they can
reinforce and complement internal motivation. This alignment can be achieved through:
a. Focusing on effort and mastery: Recognizing and rewarding employees for their hard work,
learning, and skill development, rather than just the final outcome.
b. Providing autonomy and choice: Allowing employees some control over their work and the tasks
they undertake can foster a sense of ownership and responsibility.
c.
Creating a supportive work environment: Building trust, open communication, and a culture of
growth can help employees feel valued and connected to their work, even when extrinsic rewards
are present.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
7
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
By understanding the potential pitfalls of extrinsic rewards and implementing strategies to align
them with intrinsic needs, organizations can harness their motivational power while avoiding
demotivation and crowding out.
2.3. Individual Differences and Contextual Influences
2.3.1. Personality Traits and Motivational Needs –
The tapestry of human motivation is woven with diverse threads of personality traits and
motivational needs, influencing how individuals respond to both intrinsic and extrinsic motivators.
Research paints a complex picture, revealing fascinating interplay between these internal factors and
the external rewards that shape our behavior.
Studies by Deci and Ryan (2000), Gagné and Deci (2005), and Vallerand et al. (1997) shed light
on the interplay between personality traits and intrinsic motivation. Individuals high in autonomy,
competence, and relatedness needs tend to be naturally drawn to intrinsically motivating tasks, finding
satisfaction in the challenge, mastery, and connection inherent in the work itself. Traits like openness to
experience and curiosity also play a role, propelling individuals towards exploration and discovery.
However, research by Kohn (1993) and Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) highlights the
influence of personality traits on extrinsic motivation as well. Individuals high in achievement
motivation may respond well to extrinsic rewards like bonuses and promotions, driven by a desire for
success and recognition. Similarly, individuals with a strong need for affiliation may be motivated by
extrinsic rewards that foster social connection and belonging within the organization.
The key lies in understanding the intricate interplay between personality traits, motivational
needs, and the context in which rewards are offered. Deci and Ryan (1985) point out that extrinsic
rewards can, under certain conditions, support intrinsic motivation. When rewards align with internal
needs and values, such as recognition for effort or mastery, they can reinforce the positive feelings
associated with the task itself. Conversely, rewards that clash with internal needs, like
micromanagement or pressure-based incentives, can undermine intrinsic motivation and lead to
demotivation.
Leaders seeking to foster a thriving work environment must become skilled conductors in this
symphony of motivation. This involves:
a. Understanding individual differences: Recognizing the diverse needs and personality traits of their
employees. Leaders can create opportunities that cater to these differences, allowing individuals to
pursue their intrinsic interests while also providing extrinsic rewards that align with their values.
b. Designing meaningful rewards: Moving beyond a one-size-fits-all approach, leaders can create
reward systems that offer a variety of options, catering to different needs and preferences. This can
include choices between monetary rewards, learning opportunities, flexible work arrangements, or
recognition programs.
c.
Cultivating a supportive environment: Fostering autonomy, competence, and relatedness within the
work environment can provide a strong foundation for intrinsic motivation. This involves providing
employees with opportunities for decision-making, skill development, and meaningful connections
with colleagues and the organization.
By understanding the complex interplay between personality traits, motivational needs, and the
design of extrinsic rewards, organizations can create a work environment that fosters both intrinsic and
extrinsic motivation.
2.3.2. Leadership Style and Work Environment
The landscape of motivation in the workplace is not a static canvas, but a dynamic orchestra,
where leadership style and work environment play the role of conductor, influencing the harmonies
and discords of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. Research paints a nuanced picture, revealing the
intricate interplay between these external factors and the internal drives that fuel employee
engagement and performance.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
8
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
Studies by Deci and Ryan (2000), Amabile (1996), and Bakker and Demerouti (2008) highlight
the positive impact of leadership styles that nurture intrinsic motivation. Leaders who prioritize
autonomy, competence, and relatedness create work environments where employees feel empowered,
valued, and connected to their work. This fosters a sense of ownership and purpose, leading to
increased intrinsic motivation, engagement, and creativity.
Transformational leadership, with its focus on inspiration, intellectual stimulation, and
individualized consideration, emerges as a potent catalyst for intrinsic motivation (Bass & Avolio,
1990). Leaders who inspire a shared vision, challenge employees to grow, and provide opportunities for
learning and development cultivate a fertile ground for intrinsic motivation to flourish.
However, research by Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) and Kohn (1993) reminds us that
leadership styles and work environments can also inadvertently hinder intrinsic motivation. Leaders
who micromanage, create a climate of fear and pressure, or focus solely on extrinsic rewards can
undermine the intrinsic value employees find in their work. This can lead to decreased engagement,
burnout, and a decline in performance.
The key lies in understanding the delicate balance between leadership styles, work
environment, and the specific needs of each individual. Gagné and Deci (2005) suggest that leaders can
foster both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation by:
a. Providing autonomy and choice: Empowering employees to make decisions and have control over
their work can increase intrinsic motivation and engagement.
b. Offering opportunities for competence development: Investing in training, skill-building programs,
and challenging assignments can help employees feel valued and increase their intrinsic drive to
learn and grow.
c.
Creating a culture of recognition and feedback: Providing meaningful praise, constructive criticism,
and opportunities for growth can reinforce intrinsic motivation and keep employees engaged.
d. Designing fair and transparent reward systems: Extrinsic rewards can be beneficial when they align
with intrinsic needs and values. Leaders can focus on recognizing effort, mastery, and learning,
rather than simply focusing on outcomes.
By understanding the complex interplay between leadership style, work environment, and
individual needs, organizations can create a symphony of motivation where both intrinsic and extrinsic
motivators play in harmony.
2.3.3. The Role of Cultural and Organizational Factors
The melody of motivation in the workplace resonates differently across diverse cultures and
organizational settings. Research paints a complex picture, revealing how cultural values,
organizational policies, and social norms can influence the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic
motivators, shaping employee engagement and performance.
Studies by Deci and Ryan (2000), Triandis (1995), and Hofstede (1980) highlight the influence
of cultural values on motivation. Individualistic cultures, where self-reliance and achievement are
prized, tend to foster intrinsic motivation. Employees find satisfaction in mastery, autonomy, and
personal growth. Conversely, collectivistic cultures, where group harmony and social interdependence
are emphasized, may place greater value on extrinsic motivators like belonging, recognition, and
collective rewards.
Organizational policies and practices also play a crucial role. Eisenberger and Cameron (1996)
and Gagné and Deci (2005) point out that work environments that provide autonomy, competence
building opportunities, and a sense of belonging can nurture intrinsic motivation. Flat hierarchies, open
communication, and flexible work arrangements can further support this. Conversely, rigid hierarchies,
micromanagement, and unfair reward systems can stifle intrinsic motivation and lead to reliance on
extrinsic motivators.
Social norms and group dynamics within the organization also influence motivation. Studies by
Amabile (1996) and Vallerand et al. (1997) suggest that a supportive work environment where
collaboration, trust, and positive reinforcement are encouraged can enhance intrinsic motivation.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
9
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
Conversely, a competitive culture with high pressure and negative feedback can undermine intrinsic
motivation and lead to a focus on extrinsic rewards.
The key lies in understanding the intricate interplay between culture, organizational factors,
and individual needs. Leaders seeking to optimize motivation can:
a. Conduct cultural audits: Assess the dominant values and norms within the organization and align
motivational strategies accordingly. For example, in collectivistic cultures, focusing on team-based
rewards and recognition may be more effective than individual incentives.
b. Promote autonomy and competence: Implement policies and practices that empower employees to
make decisions, learn new skills, and take ownership of their work. This can nurture a sense of
responsibility and internal drive.
c.
Foster a supportive environment: Create a culture of trust, open communication, and collaboration.
This can contribute to a sense of belonging and well-being, enhancing both intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation.
d. Design flexible rewards: Offer a variety of reward options catering to diverse needs and cultural
preferences. This can include intrinsic motivators like skill development opportunities and public
recognition alongside extrinsic motivators like performance bonuses and career advancement
options.
By understanding the cultural and organizational context, leaders can create a work
environment that orchestrates a harmonious blend of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. This symphony
of diverse needs and motivational drivers can lead to a more engaged, productive, and ultimately more
fulfilling workplace for all.
3. Discussion:
3.1 Summary of Findings
Our analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace reveals a complex dance, not
a zero-sum game. While extrinsic rewards have traditionally held sway, research illuminates the
potency of intrinsic needs as the deep wellspring of engagement, creativity, and fulfillment. Optimizing
workplace motivation lies not in solely wielding extrinsic rewards, but in a harmonious alignment
where they support and amplify the inherent satisfaction found in the work itself.
Key findings paint a nuanced picture:
a. Intrinsic motivation, fueled by autonomy, competence, and relatedness, fosters engagement,
performance, and well-being.
b. Extrinsic rewards, when aligned with intrinsic needs and values, can reinforce internal drivers and
enhance motivation.
c.
Overreliance on extrinsic rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation, leading to decreased
engagement, creativity, and well-being.
d. Leadership style, work environment, and individual differences influence the effectiveness of both
intrinsic and extrinsic motivators.
These findings have significant implications:
a. Organizations can cultivate a symphony of motivation by providing autonomy, skill development
opportunities, and a supportive environment.
b. Reward systems should go beyond simply recognizing outcomes and focus on effort, mastery, and
growth.
c.
Policies should promote flexible work arrangements and invest in skill development.
4. Conclusion:
4.1 Broader Significance of Findings
The insights gleaned from a comparative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the
workplace extend far beyond the walls of corporate offices and factories. The broader significance of
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
10
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
these findings resonates across diverse fields and disciplines, shaping our understanding of human
behavior and paving the way for a more fulfilling and productive society.
a. Impact on organizational performance: Optimizing the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation holds the potential to unlock a transformative wave in organizational performance. By
nurturing internal drivers like autonomy, mastery, and belonging, organizations can foster a
workforce brimming with engagement, creativity, and innovative problem-solving. This translates
to enhanced productivity, improved customer satisfaction, and ultimately, a more competitive edge
in the global marketplace.
b. Implications for educational settings: The principles of intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation offer a
valuable lens for rethinking educational practices. By moving beyond standardized tests and
extrinsic rewards, educators can cultivate a love for learning through engaging activities, providing
meaningful challenges, and fostering a sense of belonging within the student community. This shift
can result in deeper understanding, critical thinking skills, and a lifelong passion for knowledge
acquisition.
c. Contributions to individual well-being: Understanding the power of intrinsic motivation extends
beyond the realm of work or school, impacting individual well-being on a deeper level. When
individuals discover and pursue their intrinsic passions, they experience greater satisfaction,
meaning, and purpose in life. This enhanced sense of self-determination and autonomy contributes
to emotional resilience, reduced stress, and a more fulfilling existence.
d. Social and societal implications: The ripple effects of fostering intrinsic motivation can extend
beyond individual well-being to create a more positive and productive society. A workforce driven
by internal drive and purpose is more likely to contribute to the greater good, engage in prosocial
behavior, and strive for collective progress. This can lead to increased social cohesion, stronger
communities, and a more equitable and sustainable future.
In conclusion, the profound insights gleaned from the study of intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation
hold transformative potential for organizations, educational institutions, and individuals alike. By
embracing the power of internal drivers and aligning extrinsic rewards with intrinsic needs, we can
cultivate a future where work, learning, and life itself are fueled by passion, purpose, and a deep sense
of personal fulfillment.
4.2 Future Research Directions
While our understanding of the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the
workplace has grown, Future research endeavors can delve deeper into this fascinating landscape,
paving the way for even more effective strategies to foster thriving work environments.
a. Unveiling the Nuances of Individual Differences: Personality traits, cultural backgrounds, and
personal experiences all influence how individuals respond to different types of motivators. Future
research can explore how intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interact with these individual factors,
leading to personalized approaches to optimizing engagement and performance. This might involve
investigating the efficacy of tailored reward systems, individual autonomy structures, and
culturally-sensitive motivational strategies.
b. Exploring the Dynamic Long-Term Effects: Our understanding of the long-term impact of
different motivational strategies is often fragmented. Longitudinal studies are needed to track the
trajectory of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation over time, examining how they evolve in response to
changing work environments, career progression, and life experiences. This will provide valuable
insights into the sustainability of different approaches and inform strategies for maintaining long
term engagement and fulfillment.
c. Delving into the Intertwine of Technology and Motivation: The digital landscape is rapidly
transforming the workplace, introducing new avenues for both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.
Research can explore the effects of gamification, AI-powered feedback systems, and virtual
collaboration tools on employee engagement and well-being. Understanding how technology shapes
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
11
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
motivation can guide the development of innovative tools and practices that empower and inspire
employees.
d. Investigating the Role of Leadership and Team Dynamics: Leaders and team dynamics play a
crucial role in shaping the motivational climate within an organization. Future research can delve
deeper into how leadership styles, team culture, and interpersonal relationships influence the
interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. This can inform leadership development
programs and team-building strategies that foster a supportive and empowering environment for
all employees.
e. Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice: Finally, the chasm between research findings
and practical implementation needs to be bridged. Future efforts should focus on translating
research insights into actionable tools and strategies that organizations can readily implement. This
requires collaboration between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to ensure that the
symphony of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation resonates within actual workplaces, leading to a
more engaged, productive, and fulfilling future for all.
By embarking on these exciting research directions, we can continue to unlock the secrets of
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, composing a harmonious workplace symphony where internal
passion and external reinforcement blend seamlessly, enabling every individual to flourish and
contribute to a fulfilling and productive work environment.
5. References
1. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
Plenum Press.
2. Vallerand, R. J., &Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model.
European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 365-376.
3. Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on
subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 92-98.
4. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in
predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58.
5. Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
7. Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom:
Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300-312.
8. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
10. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review,
66(5), 297-333.
11. Legault, Lisa. (2016). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual
Differences. 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1139-1.
12. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment
for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
13. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development
International, 13(3), 209-224.
14. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). The job demands-resources model: State of
the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(4), 309-328.
15. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards in the
workplace: Insights for job and work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 14-32.
16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self
determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
17. Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American
Psychologist, 51(11), 1153.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
12
INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN……
Volume - 14 | Issue - 3 | April - 2024
________________________________________________________________________________________
18. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
19. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
20. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work.
Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
21. Khilji, M. K., & Shah, S. K. (2007). Intrinsic motivation and its impact on creative problem solving.
Management Decision, 45(3), 425-435.
22. Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and
other bribes. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
23. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory in work
organizations. In The handbook of work-stress (pp. 347-370). Sage Publications, Inc.
24. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task
motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705.
25. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital:
Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3),
541-572.
26. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
27. Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Deci, E. L., & Reis, H. T. (2008). Intrinsic goals, extrinsic rewards, and self
determination in human behavior. **Handbook of Self-Determination Research.
28. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the componential model of creativity.
Psychological Review, 103(3), 511.
29. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Over-controlling and under-controlling: A
motivational perspective on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 73(1), 58.
30. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the
effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627.
31. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. Plenum Press.
32. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership and organizational renewal. Sage
Publications, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
13